Replies to LegCo questions
LCQ14: Duty on tobacco and tobacco products
Following is a question by the Hon Martin Lee and a written reply by the
Secretary for Food and Health, Dr York Chow, in the Legislative Council today
(July 9):
Question:
Regarding the duty on and prices of tobacco products, will the Government inform
this Council:
(a) whether it knows the average prices of tobacco products, their actual
average prices after adjustment for inflation and the changes in their sales
before and after the relevant provisions of the Smoking (Public Health)
(Amendment) Ordinance came into operation on January 1, 2007;
(b) given that the prices of tobacco products have increased at a lower rate
than inflation in recent years, resulting in a consistent rise in the sales of
tobacco products, whether the authorities will consider increasing the tobacco
duty to drive up the prices of tobacco products, so as to curb the growth in
their sales; and
(c) whether the authorities will consider allocating a certain percentage of the
revenue from the tobacco duty for smoking cessation services, anti-smoking work
as well as treatment of and researches on smoking-related diseases?
Reply:
Madam President,
My reply to the various parts of the question asked by Hon Martin Lee is as
follows:
(a) According to the statistical data compiled by the Customs and Excise
Department (C&ED) on 22 brands of cigarettes sold in Hong Kong, the average
retail price of these tobacco products was HK$26.4 in October 2006. In May 2008,
i.e. 18 months after the vast expansion of no-smoking areas, the average retail
price of these 22 brands of cigarettes was HK$26.9. Their actual average market
price in 2008 after discounting inflation (at 2006 prices) was HK$25.2.
We do not have any sales figures of tobacco products. Nevertheless, the C&ED
recorded a total of 287.493 million sticks of duty-paid cigarettes in October
2006 while the latest figure (as at May 2008) was 288.936 million sticks.
(b) The HKSAR Government has been taking a multi-pronged approach, i.e. through
a combination of legislation, taxation, publicity, education, enforcement as
well as smoking cessation services, to contain the proliferation of tobacco use
and minimise the impact of passive smoking on public health. Since the passage
of the Smoking (Public Health) (Amendment) Bill 2005, many more smoke-free areas
have been created in Hong Kong and the public are now enjoying a generally
healthier environment. Most smokers have also been law-abiding and co-operative,
not smoking when they are indoors or when smoking affects others. We believe
that the situation will improve further after the fixed penalty system for
smoking offences is in place.
With regard to the question of increasing tobacco duty, the Government will
review the rates of various taxes and duties in the annual Budget exercise after
taking into consideration factors such as public finance, economic conditions
and relevant policies. We will continue to monitor tobacco use and its impact on
public health and take these into account when we consider whether the rate of
tobacco duty has to be revised.
(c) Under the Government's long-standing principles of public finance
management, the revenues from tobacco duty, similar to other tax revenues, will
be credited to the General Revenue. The Government will then make appropriate
allocation of resources based on actual requirements for expenditure through the
annual Resource Allocation Exercise to ensure fair and reasonable allocation of
resources among various policy areas. If it is rigidly laid down that a certain
proportion of a particular item of revenue has to be designated for a particular
use, this will undermine our well-established resources allocation mechanism and
erode its flexibility.
As a matter of fact, the Government has in recent years devoted more financial
resources every year to tobacco control. The funding allocation for the Tobacco
Control Office (TCO) under the Department of Health (DH) and the Hong Kong
Council on Smoking and Health (COSH) has increased from $18.5 million in 2003-04
to $55.4 million in 2007-08, representing a three-fold increase within 4 years.
Where the provision of smoking cessation services is concerned, both DH and the
Hospital Authority have stepped up their efforts by setting up more smoking
cessation clinics, establishing the Smoking Cessation Hotline and enhancing
their counselling and referral services. Looking into the future, DH will
provide more smoking cessation services at the district level by working more
closely together with non-governmental organisations and healthcare
practitioners in the private sector.
The Government will continue to promote smoking cessation through the Council of
Smoking and Health (COSH) and at the district level. We also believe that
opportunities should be taken to provide smokers with information on smoking
cessation services through enforcement of the fixed penalty system. To that end,
we will print the Smoking Cessation Hotline number of the TCO on fixed penalty
notices. Information on smoking cessation services will also be provided
together with the issuing of payment reminders.
As for research, the Government has been providing funding to COSH for
conducting research and surveys on a number of smoking-related topics such as
"Youth Smoking and Health Survey", "Smoking and Passive Smoking in Children" and
"Passive Smoking and Risks for Heart Disease and Cancer in Hong Kong Catering
Workers" etc. The Government will continue to provide funding support to
research in the area of tobacco control. It is therefore apparent that the
Government will provide adequate financial resources for taking forward our
tobacco control policy in the interest of public health without making it a rule
that tobacco duty revenues must be spent on tobacco control purposes.
Ends/Wednesday, July 9, 2008
Issued at HKT 12:06
NNNN