Replies to LegCo questions
LCQ9: Hawker licences
Following is a question by the Hon Wong Kwok-kin and a written reply by
the Secretary for Food and Health, Dr Ko Wing-man, in the Legislative
Council today (June 26):
Question:
This Council had approved a funding allocation of $230 million for
launching a five-year assistance scheme (the Assistance Scheme) for the
licensed hawkers (hawkers) operating in 43 fixed-pitch hawker areas
(hawker areas). Those hawkers carrying out reconstruction of their
stalls in-situ, moving their stalls to other pitch spaces or opting for
voluntary surrender of their hawker licences will be granted a one-off
ex-gratia payment, but the hawkers' assistants (the assistants) will not
benefit from the Assistance Scheme. In addition, some hawkers have
relayed to me that due to the redevelopment of the Kwun Tong town
centre, the Mut Wah Street Temporary Hawker Bazaar (Mut Wah Street
Bazaar) will be relocated to a new temporary hawker bazaar in October
this year, affecting 80-odd stall operators. Although relocation has
been arranged for the hawkers concerned, it has been learnt that some of
them intend to close down the business, and their assistants will not
benefit from the relocation project. In this connection, will the
Government inform this Council:
(a) given that in 2010, the authorities gave priority to the existing
registered assistants with experience in the hawking trade to select 70
per cent of the vacant fixed hawker pitches, of the number of registered
assistants who selected the hawker pitches in the end; of the current
number of assistants registered with the Food and Environmental Hygiene
Department;
(b) whether it has estimated the number of hawker licences to be
surrendered under the Assistance Scheme; as the authorities had
indicated at a committee meeting of this Council that they would
consider re-issuing the surrendered hawker licences for application by
interested parties, when the authorities will make the relevant
decision; whether the authorities will make reference to the approach
mentioned in (a) to give priority to the registered assistants in
applying for vacant fixed hawker pitches; if they will, of the details;
if not, the reasons for that;
(c) given that when starting off the buyout package for the live poultry
trade in 2008, the authorities had, apart from providing grants to live
poultry retailers who voluntarily surrendered their licences, provided
one-off grants to the affected local live poultry workers as well,
whether the authorities will make reference to that approach and provide
grants to the registered assistants affected by the hawkers'
surrendering of licences; if they will, of the details; if not, the
reasons for that; whether the authorities will consider implementing
other measures to help those registered assistants who are affected; and
(d) given that the Mut Wah Street Bazaar is not one of the 43 hawker
areas under the Assistance Scheme, and the affected hawkers cannot
obtain the ex-gratia payment of $120,000 even if they surrender their
licences, whether the authorities will consider extending the coverage
of the Assistance Scheme to cover other hawkers who are affected by
urban redevelopment projects and voluntarily surrender their licences;
if they will, of the details; if not, the reasons for that?
Reply:
President,
The Kwun Tong Town Centre redevelopment project of the Urban Renewal
Authority (URA) covers the Mut Wah Street Temporary Hawker Bazaar and
the Hip Wo Street Hawker Bazaar in Kwun Tong. The URA is now
constructing a two-storey transitional hawker bazaar at the original
site of the Kwun Tong Government Offices Building to provide fixed
hawker pitches for the purpose of accommodating the licensed stalls in
the two hawker bazaars named above whilst actions are being taken to
redevelop the on-street licensed hawker stalls in the district. Apart
from providing stalls with roller shutters facilities at the
transitional hawker bazaar, the URA will also provide relocation
subsidies to licensed hawkers affected by the relocation. Upon the
relocation of licensed hawkers to the transitional hawker bazaar, their
registered assistants may continue to assist in the business there.
Subject to the support of the Kwun Tong District Council, the Food and
Environmental Hygiene Department (FEHD) may exercise discretion to
allocate vacant stalls remaining in the transitional hawker bazaar to
those registered assistants of hawkers originally operating in the two
hawker bazaars if they are interested in applying for the hawker stalls.
My reply to the various parts of the question is as follows:
(a) According to records, there are currently around 5 300 registered
assistants in the hawking trade in Hong Kong. Following the hawker
licensing policy review in 2008-09, the Administration had in 2010 given
priority to applicants who were registered assistants allowing them to
apply for 70 per cent of the vacant fixed-pitch hawker stalls that were
suitable for re-issue of licences. The selection was decided by ballot.
Of the 218 licences issued, 95 were issued to registered assistants.
(b) The Government has not made any projection for the number of
fixed-pitch hawker licences that may be voluntarily surrendered under
the Assistance Scheme for Hawkers in Fixed-pitch Hawker Areas
(Assistance Scheme). That said, for the purpose of drawing up the
projected expenditure of the Assistance Scheme as set out in the paper
submitted to the Finance Committee of the Legislative Council for
funding approval, we have cited an expenditure level that is projected
on the basis of the crude assumption that 20 per cent of eligible
hawkers will opt for surrender of licences.
At the meetings of the Panel on Food Safety and Environmental Hygiene
and the Finance Committee of the Legislative Council held in February
and March this year respectively, some Members suggested that if the
voluntary licence surrender arrangement received overwhelming response,
resulting in a large number of vacant stalls in an individual hawker
area which far exceeded the number of stalls to be relocated, hence
affecting its sustainability, the Administration should consider
re-issuing new hawker licences to fill the vacant stalls. The Government
has noted the suggestion and will re-visit it after the Assistance
Scheme has been implemented for a period of time. The circumstances of
each hawker area, including the business environment, fire safety and
environmental hygiene considerations, and the views of the District
Councils and local residents will be duly taken into account. If the
suggestion is accepted at the end of the day, the Government will also
make reference to past experience and the views of stakeholders when
deciding how to re-issue new hawker licences.
(c) The five-year Assistance Scheme aims to provide financial assistance
to hawkers in the 43 hawkers areas for stall reconstruction and
relocation in order to expedite the work of reducing fire risks.
Besides, an ex-gratia payment (EGP) is offered under the Assistance
Scheme for voluntary surrender of hawker licences to speed up the
release of pitches and hence facilitate the relocation of stalls which
pose higher fire risks. The arrangement of voluntary surrender of hawker
licences under the Assistance Scheme is consistent with those under
previous voluntary surrender schemes for hawker licences. The Government
will offer an EGP to eligible licence holders as an assistance for their
retirement or transition to other trades.
Some licence holders may employ one or more assistants to help them
operate their hawking business. The FEHD's role has been to register
such stall assistants for law enforcement purpose.
The EGP of $120,000 offered to licence holders under the voluntary
surrender of hawker licences arrangement of the Assistance Scheme is
well above the amount granted under similar voluntary surrender schemes
in the past. For licence holders who have decided to surrender their
hawker licences, it is incumbent upon them to settle their relationship
with their assistants themselves.
(d) Currently, some hawker stalls are close to the staircase discharge
points of adjacent buildings. In the event of a fire at the stalls,
flames, dense smoke and hot fumes may well block the discharge points of
buildings, creating the chimney effect and obstructing the means of
escape. To reduce fire risks posed by on-street hawking activities in
the hawker areas, the Government considers it necessary to improve the
fire safety and design of hawker stalls, and to relocate them away from
staircase discharge points of buildings, access for fire appliance or
locations that may block the operation of aerial ladders. The Assistance
Scheme aims to provide financial assistance to hawkers in the hawker
areas for stall reconstruction and relocation in order to expedite the
work in reducing fire risks. As for other hawkers not in the hawker
areas, including those operating in hawker bazaars, wall stalls and
newspaper stalls etc., they are scattered over different off-street
locations or different spots on street. These stalls are not located in
densely-populated districts or do not congregate on street. In either
case, the fire risks posed to adjacent buildings are relatively low.
They are therefore not covered in the Assistance Scheme.
Ends/Wednesday, June 26, 2013
Issued at HKT 15:33
NNNN